Methods for particular work
Individual Skills
Each Skill defines when it applies, its inputs, method, outputs, and Skill-specific criteria. It declares the Knowledge it needs; domain facts and local rules remain in reusable Knowledge. Common workflow controls are supplied by the common foundation.
Review C# beyond compiler diagnostics
csharp_review inspects language-dependent defects and system-boundary risks. It produces category results, evidence-backed findings, and an explicit handoff for issues outside its scope.
Find missing confirmations before implementation
constraint_derivation_index selects the applicable constraint-derivation Skills for design and code artifacts, then sequences the commonality pass. The selected Skills expose hidden assumptions and confirmation needs; their outputs do not approve requirements.
Learn a business task through conversation
business_learning_interview starts from the desired result and turns partial explanations into a provisional business hypothesis. It keeps human-stated facts, AI hypotheses, and open questions distinguishable, then hands off for scoping when the boundary is ready.
These are examples from the repository catalog. Each Skill has its own applicability and maturity; a catalog entry alone does not establish readiness for every task.
Individual Skill · worked example
What belongs to csharp_review?
The review method is specific to this Skill. Execution management comes from the common foundation; people retain acceptance authority.
| Individual Skill and its selected Knowledge | Common foundation |
|---|---|
| Review method: establish the Roslyn baseline, avoid duplicate findings, and inspect applicable language, lifecycle, exception, synchronization, and system-boundary behavior. | Start and route: capture the work instruction and its boundary, select the Skill, and record the runtime binding. |
| Review material: the Skill declares its Knowledge needs. Resolve the relevant C# criteria and common source-analysis criteria; those facts and rules remain in Knowledge. | Reference delivery: discover and resolve the selected Knowledge by XID and preserve its identity in the execution record. |
| Review output: category results, severity, supporting evidence, rationale, remediation direction, unconfirmed items, and the next owner for out-of-scope findings. | Record and check: track work items, artifacts, concerns, judgments, and handoff. Deterministic verify and close check the workflow record; they do not judge whether the review findings are correct. |
An independent quality review assesses the output when required. A person reviews the findings and evidence, decides which remediation to adopt, and accepts the result or returns it for repair.